The right to the city is like a cry and a demand ; a cry out of exigent demand by those deprived of basic material and legal rights , and a demand based on an aspiration for the future by those discontented with life as they see around them and perceived as limiting their potentials for growth and creativity . But this right slowly meanders through the surprising detours of nostalgia and tourism , the return to the heart of the traditional city and the call of existent or recently developed centralities . Such an aberration in the current modern urban life have made GREED as the profit motive, the euphemism which is producing growth at the expense of vital fluxes (anarchy players) and stifles creativity and livability in human life while the genuine growth is being determined by extension , enhancement and deeping of the whole which is not a yes no property but a gradual property of matter according to it degree of wholeness , degree of harmony and degree of structural coherence . According to this presumption , livability of urban life is an unfold structure that cannot be created by Issuing detailed instructions , morality establishment and technic as a means of knowledge presentation whereas urban life structure is an emergent property of vital matter that it's livability admit diversity , complexity and tensions between interpretations and ambiguity which are leading us to POIESIS as a dynamic presentation of knowledge rather than technic as a linear narrative one . There fore , the much number of human behavioral actions should be based on poiesis in the soul through the cultivation of virtue and knowledge not technical Imitation that contributing to the homogenization of representations that we can call it subdued brilliance .